Brand
We mean business
Comprehensive legal services for businesses
in New Jersey and New York

COVID-19 Notice: In order to best serve you, while being mindful of your health and safety, we are available for consultations and conferences via telephone and video. We can arrange for documents to be prepared, reviewed, signed and exchanged electronically. We are ready to assist you with all of your legal needs.

We are open and ready to assist you. Go to our COVID-19 Updates page to see our latest statement on the crisis and a list of recent news and developments during this challenging time.
GO
Close
top-contextual
comprehensive legal services for businesses

New Jersey asphalt companies accuse competitor of bid-rigging

Two New Jersey asphalt companies are suing an out-of-state competitor, accusing it of conspiring with several local municipalities to control the road paving business. The commercial dispute involves seven eastern Pennsylvania cities, all of which are said to have played a role in the competing business’ plan to rig the bidding process.

The lawsuit alleges that all seven of the municipalities issued invitations to bid on road construction projects that required specifications only one business could deliver. Those specifications required bidding companies to use a particular brand of asphalt sealer, called Grip Tight, as well as a specific grade of gravel to be used in a process called “high performance chip seal.”

The problem was that the defendant company is the exclusive distributor of Grip Tight, at least in the northeastern United States. Not only that, the lawsuit claims, but the defendant purchased the entire supply of gravel from the only quarry that produces the grade of gravel the municipalities required. Therefore, no other companies were eligible to bid on the projects. Finally, the municipalities required that bidding companies own and use a 22-foot gravel spreader, which eliminated much of the competition.

The attorney representing the two New Jersey companies explained that many times, municipalities will allow bidding companies to use substitute materials. But that wasn’t the case for these bid invitations, he said. The municipalities accepted no substitutes for the brand of pavement sealer they specified. In fact, according to the lawsuit, a road department employee for one township, which isn’t named in the lawsuit, admitted that the defendant gave the paving specifications to the township.

In addition to the company accused of rigging the bidding process, the lawsuit names three townships. The lawsuit’s claims include illegal restraint of trade, anti-competitive conduct, discrimination, interference with economic opportunity and violation of Pennsylvania’s competitive bidding law.

Unfortunately, bid-rigging is an all-too-common practice, in New Jersey and across the country. Rather than allowing companies to compete fairly, bid rigging creates unfair monopolies and prevents businesses from being allowed to expand and thrive. If you suspect your company is the target of a bid-rigging scheme, it may be time to contact an attorney who focuses on commercial litigation to ensure you aren’t shut out of further business opportunities.

Source: The Morning Call, “N.J. firms allege Emmaus company sought monopoly on paving jobs,” Peter Hall, May 3, 2012

Office Location

Dunn Lambert, LLC
East 80 Route 4 Suite 170
Paramus, NJ 07652

Paramus Law Office Map

Dunn Lambert, LLC
1745 Broadway, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10019
New York Law Office Map


Phone: 201-957-0874
Fax: 201-291-0140

Phone: 201-291-0700
Fax: 212-519-9804
Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S.News & world report | 2017

GET ANSWERS from a firm
with a sense of business.

Archives

Review US
FindLaw Network